Episode 075: Recruiting Lawyers and Librarians to Law Librarianship
Wednesday, November 7, 2007
Playing time: 50:26

This is a talk I gave at the Libraries Without Borders conference in Toronto, on Thursday, October 18, 2007.  I'm concerned that we may be overselling the profession--there is certainly a demand for qualified law librarians, but how much is that demand, and what really constitutes "qualified"?  With the rising costs of legal education, how long can we continue to expect entry-level academic law librarians to have JD degrees? 


Theme Music: T. Nile, Get Together. (T. Nile's CD, At My Table, is available from Festival Distribution and CD Baby and through iTunes.)
Blog: http://checkthisoutpodcast.com
Email: jim.milles@gmail.com
Comment line: (716) 989-4422 or Skype "jmilles"
Direct download: Episode075.mp3
Category: podcasts -- posted at: 8:52 PM
Comments[1]

Episode 074: Lawyerswithdepression.com
Friday, June 22, 2007
Playing time: 20:39

Dan Lukasik is a successful Buffalo lawyer who struggles with severe clinical depression.  He has recently created a support group for lawyers with depression, and is building a website with links and resources to provide assistance to lawyers and create greater awareness and understanding among the public.  Last week Dan and I talked about the problems of lawyers with depression.

Theme Music: T. Nile, Get Together. (T. Nile's CD, At My Table, is available from Festival Distribution and CD Baby and through iTunes.)
Blog: http://checkthisoutpodcast.com
Email: jim.milles@gmail.com
Comment line: (716) 989-4422 or Skype "jmilles"



Direct download: Episode074.mp3
Category: podcasts -- posted at: 9:00 AM
Comments[0]

Episode 073: Susan Drummond and Her Neighbor, Mr. Rogers
Friday, June 15, 2007
Playing time: 42:18

In August 2005, York University Law Professor Susan Drummond was informed that she owed $12,000 to Rogers Wireless for phone calls made from her stolen phone.  Not only did Professor Drummond fight back, she turned it into a study of the legal system and built a website about it.  Here Susan talks with me about her use of online consumer advocacy and her adventures in the Ontario small claims court.

Theme Music: T. Nile, Get Together. (T. Nile's CD, At My Table, is available from Festival Distribution and CD Baby and through iTunes.)
Blog: http://checkthisoutpodcast.com
Email: jim.milles@gmail.com
Comment line: (716) 989-4422 or Skype "jmilles"

Direct download: Episode073.mp3
Category: podcasts -- posted at: 5:08 PM
Comments[0]

Episode 072: The Yirka Question
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
Playing time: 28:43

Guest: 
Carl Yirka, Director of the Julien and Virginia Cornell Library and Professor of Law, Vermont Law School.  I speak with Carl about making hard decisions: what traditional library services should we stop doing, so that we can do other things that are a better fit with our institutional priorities?

Atul Gawande, "
The Bell Curve," New Yorker, December 6, 2004; Better: A Surgeon's Notes on Performance (2007).



Email from Carl Yirka to lawlibdir listserv, May 31, 2007:

Greetings from Vermont:

I'm writing a report for my Deans and am discussing some of the things we have consciously stopped doing, or are doing less than we have in the past.

One of the questions we try to ask is:  what can we stop doing, in order to do other higher priority items?  After I once asked this question at a faculty meeting, the former CFO began to call this "the Yirka question"... not to honor me in any way, but so he could ask the question without anyone getting angry at him.  It is of course the sort of question that raises issues of turf.

Here's a brief list of what we have stopped doing:

  • We are not binding law journals that appear in HeinOnline;
  • we are collecting less government documents;
  • less actively collecting of archival materials;
  • not offering ref service from the Ref Desk - now  offered from our offices;
  • not sending "of interest" notices to  (mostly) faculty for new books;
  • not doing "prepare to practice/research review" research workshops  previously done at the end of spring term;
  • faculty research  workshops -  not done for a few years;
  • not having 4 librarians each teach 2 sections of Legal Research. Now we have 3 teaching 3;
  • we've cut back on the number of research classes for MSEL (Master of Science in Environmental Law)  students taught by a librarian. --The writing instructor incorporated basic legal research into the Writing classes, and a librarian introduced them to our subscription databases and the Free Environmental Sites Guide;
  • not administering CALI -  now administered by Academic Success office;
  • not assisting faculty with TWEN and PowerPoint - the faculty administrative assistants are doing that;

In recent conversation with my sister, who is a librarian in a special library, she told me they no longer check in periodicals.  After getting over the shock of that, I began to wonder whether we are too constrained in what we feel we must do.

So, I am curious as to what your libraries have stopped doing.

Best regards,

Carl



Email from Carl Yirka to lawlibdir listserv, June 1, 2007:

Several of you have asked 1) why are you stopping these things, and 2) what are we now doing that is more important than the services we have discontinued?

We made the stop decisions consciously.  In part we were short staffed, and were doing a work redesign, so wanted to stop doing things that we felt were not worth it.  We were not doing these things badly, but in spite of doing them well no one seemed to care whether we were doing these things.  Penny Hazelton pointed out to me that one of Don Dunn's favorite questions is, "What are you doing well  that you don't need to do at all?"

Our Dean had not specifically asked us to do this exercise; I'm trying to be ahead of the curve.

We are not yet at the point of doing the new services.  As part of our redesign we have hired a new Lawyer/Librarian starting 2 July, and are moving a librarian from collection development to a second lawyer/librarian position this summer.  We will soon be in the market for an librarian for collection development and technology; we'll be interviewing at AALL I trust.

Here's a bit of background explaining how we got here.

I have heard from many of you that your deans feel that your libraries are doing a good job, that you run a good library, but that in spite of that deans are cutting staffing and book budgets, and taking library space for other purposes.

I have not heard it described quite this brusquely, but the conversation I imagine go something like this:
Dean to Library Director:  "The library is doing a good job for the budget you have; but what can you do if I cut your budget by 10%.... 20%..... 30%.....  I know, I know.. Library directors for decades have made the claim that budgets must get bigger.. publishers charge more, we can't control that... new technologies cost a lot....  you need lots of staff to do the library stuff....the library needs more space...you never want to get rid of anything...  Let's try something different.  Cut the budget, do your best on collection and services, and let me tell you when we reach a level that hurts the institution."

In other words, I think some deans don't value what we have been doing, (despite our efforts to educate deans) or to put it a different way - what we have been doing is not in synch with institutional priorities.  If they were, deans would be putting more money toward libraries. They seem to find money for their priorities.

So what institutional priorities are there that the Library might take on?

The new goal that we have identified is that the Library needs to do more to help faculty be more productive scholars.  Yes... that means to help them publish more. Clearly this is an institutional goal, and one that is on the margin of  running a good library.   Providing the book and electronic materials for faculty to do their research is a traditional library goal;, we are talking about doing something more.

I've been surveying our faculty asking what sort of things they would like the Library to do in order for them to be more productive scholars.  I've said that at this point I can't make any firm commitments; but I want them to "dream no small dreams."

I realize that this is a bit scary.  I realize that the things faculty might want to outsource to the library are those things that are not working at all, or are not working well.  That's the way life is:  the opportunities lie where things are not going well.

There are risks here.  Will I get their hopes up for things we can't produce?  Will some of their hopes be far outside the scope of traditional library work?  (I have heard of one law library that now supervises faculty secretaries, and makes faculty travel arrangements).  Might we become glorified (or unglorified) research assistants or secretaries?  I think the benefits outweigh the risks.  Doing merely the more traditional library goals seems to me a recipe for slow death.

I provide you here with the unedited list of faculty desires. Some of these things we already do, but perhaps not to the level faculty would like, or they don't realize we have done them. Some items are not clearly keyed to faculty scholarly productivity. You will note that "footnotes"  comes up more than once.

Suggestions so far:
  • understand the rankings of  law reviews, and which law review would be the best place to submit articles of on various topics
  • Draft the footnotes; draft some of the footnotes;
  • write the complex research footnotes: e.g determine the cites to similar statutes in the other 49 states.
  • review drafts of faculty articles and determine whether there are better footnotes.
  • Research Fellows* have a research assistant pool in library supervised by librarians; have librarians do the paperwork and training of research assistants;
  • librarians review research assistant's work product
  • have electronic feeds come to a Librarian, and only forward the most relevant to the faculty member.
  • Create complete SSRN files for faculty, include all historical literature as well
  • create a portal for every upper level class whether faculty ask for it or not.
  • Current awareness services: CLIP, RSS feeds, Google reader
  • take over responsibility for plagiarism reviews of student papers
  • Librarians as consultants on faculty web page: cv creation; click thru to articles, SSRN
  • Word/Powerpoint expertise & creation
  • Footnotes: do them?  Clean them up?  Know blue book well.
  • supplement the work of the Communications office: understand the publishers, book, periodical, newspaper culture well enough to act as a consultant for faculty considering unique publication places: literary agent for the faculty
  • Understand the pecking order of law reviews better, especially for interdisciplinary journals
  • Understand the timing and template issues for law journal publication
  • Which law reviews take unsolicited manuscripts
  • Content creators for blogs
  • Liaison lunch with faculty member every semester; individual and group lunch
  • Create on demand bibliographies for faculty members
  • Manage faculty contact with other libraries: (Several faculty members pay for privileges to use Dartmouth College Library) renew books, etc.
  • Librarian *embedded* near where faculty work
  • Provide competitive intelligence:  how do other law schools do X
  • Provide lunch table consults in the faculty dining area
  • Provide more Science databases
  • Clean up blue book sites
  • Law review rankings
  • Blogs; act as content creators for blogs
  • Train RAs to do social science research & govdocs research
  • Additional classroom support: review and prep video clips
  • Develop better video collection
  • Develop course reserves for classes
  • become the experts for Citation 9
  • Play a role in the hierarchy between faculty and RA: mid level associate
  • Develop brief bank for clinic

Perhaps you think this is completely crazy, or perhaps you already do all this.  I would enjoy your comments.  If nothing else, I've got down a rough draft that will help me write my memo.
best regards,
Carl

Theme Music: T. Nile, Get Together. (T. Nile's CD, At My Table, is available from Festival Distribution and CD Baby and through iTunes.)
Blog: http://checkthisoutpodcast.com
Email: jim.milles@gmail.com
Comment line: (716) 989-4422 or Skype "jmilles"
Direct download: Episode072.mp3
Category: podcasts -- posted at: 5:35 PM
Comments[0]

Episode 071: Full Frontal Feminism, with Jessica Valenti
Wednesday, June 6, 2007
Playing time: 27:43

Jessica Valenti is the founder and Executive Editor of
Feministing.com, and author of a new book, Full Frontal Feminism: A Young Woman's Guide to Why Feminism Matters.
Theme Music: T. Nile, Get Together. (T. Nile's CD, At My Table, is available from Festival Distribution and CD Baby and through iTunes.)
Blog: http://checkthisoutpodcast.com
Email: jim.milles@gmail.com
Comment line: (716) 989-4422 or Skype "jmilles"
Direct download: Episode071.mp3
Category: podcasts -- posted at: 5:59 PM
Comments[0]


A podcast by James Milles, University at Buffalo Law School